diff --git a/patches/api/Legacy-data-should-look-for-legacy-materials.patch b/patches/api/Legacy-data-should-look-for-legacy-materials.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index 9fdd2b7c0..000000000
--- a/patches/api/Legacy-data-should-look-for-legacy-materials.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,19 +0,0 @@
-From 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Shane Freeder <theboyetronic@gmail.com>
-Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2021 09:26:06 +0100
-Subject: [PATCH] Legacy data should look for legacy materials
-
-
-diff --git a/src/main/java/org/bukkit/inventory/ItemStack.java b/src/main/java/org/bukkit/inventory/ItemStack.java
-index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 100644
---- a/src/main/java/org/bukkit/inventory/ItemStack.java
-+++ b/src/main/java/org/bukkit/inventory/ItemStack.java
-@@ -0,0 +0,0 @@ public class ItemStack implements Cloneable, ConfigurationSerializable, net.kyor
- 
-         Material type;
-         if (version < 0) {
--            type = Material.getMaterial(Material.LEGACY_PREFIX + (String) args.get("type"));
-+            type = Material.getMaterial(Material.LEGACY_PREFIX + (String) args.get("type"), true);
- 
-             byte dataVal = (type != null && type.getMaxDurability() == 0) ? (byte) damage : 0; // Actually durable items get a 0 passed into conversion
-             type = Bukkit.getUnsafe().fromLegacy(new MaterialData(type, dataVal), true);