Not technically 100% correct since null != "null", but without sacrficing performance this is the best way to fix the issue in the current implementation.
By: md_5 <git@md-5.net>
If the server crashes during chunk generation then the chunk would have never
been added to the executor, this caused a second exception to be thrown when
the server shutdown from the first exception
By: Thinkofdeath <thinkofdeath@spigotmc.org>
In Minecraft 1.7, URL processing was removed from the client while the
server gained the ability to designate a URL to be launched in response to
clicking text. However, this functionality is not implemented in the
vanilla server. This commit adds that functionality to messages sent to
the client, processing URLs as clickable.
Additionally, char array iteration is replaced with regex.
By: mbax <matt@phozop.net>
When growing trees we use a BlockChangeDelegate which queues up the block
changes so plugins can modify/block/log tree growing. However, we always
check the actual world when checking for existing blocks. This means when
the tree growing code checks to see if putting a leaf in a block is valid
it may incorrectly overwrite a log block that should exist in that
location. To ensure trees grow correctly we now check the delegate itself
for blocks that match the queried location before checking the world.
By: Travis Watkins <amaranth@ubuntu.com>
This class is designed to be an invisible layer between a normal collection,
and one that silently loses entries because they are only weakly referencable.
Some operations have additional overhead to be semantically correct, but it
maintains the equals contract for all entries, as opposed to identity.
It does not support the equals or hash code method as it cannot easily have
the transitive and commutative properties.
By: Wesley Wolfe <weswolf@aol.com>
This class is a general purpose task execution system, that uses stages
to separate processing blocks for asynchronous and synchronous
executions.
By: Wesley Wolfe <weswolf@aol.com>
This change affects the old chat compatibility layer from an
implementation only standpoint. It does not queue the 'event' to fire,
but rather queues a runnable that allows the calling thread to wait for
execution to finish.
The other effect of this change is that rcon connects now have their
commands queued to be run on next server tick using the same
implementation.
The internal implementation is in org.bukkit.craftbukkit.util.Waitable.
It is very similar to a Future<T> task, but only contains minimal
implementation with object.wait() and object.notify() calls
under the hood of waitable.get() and waitable.run().
PlayerPreLoginEvent now properly implements thread-safe event execution
by queuing the events similar to chat and rcon. This is still a poor way
albeit proper way to implement thread-safety; PlayerPreLoginEvent will
stay deprecated.
By: Wesley Wolfe <weswolf@aol.com>
After further testing it appears that while the original LongHashtable
has issues with object creation churn and is severly slower than even
java.util.HashMap in general case benchmarks it is in fact very efficient
for our use case.
With this in mind I wrote a replacement LongObjectHashMap modeled after
LongHashtable. Unlike the original implementation this one does not use
Entry objects for storage so does not have the same object creation churn.
It also uses a 2D array instead of a 3D one and does not use a cache as
benchmarking shows this is more efficient. The "bucket size" was chosen
based on benchmarking performance of the HashMap with contents that would
be plausible for a 200+ player server. This means it uses a little extra
memory for smaller servers but almost always uses less than the normal
java.util.HashMap.
To make up for the original LongHashtable being a poor choice for generic
datasets I added a mixer to the new implementation based on code from
MurmurHash. While this has no noticable effect positive or negative with
our normal use of chunk coordinates it makes the HashMap perform just as
well with nearly any kind of dataset.
After these changes ChunkProviderServer.isChunkLoaded() goes from using
20% CPU time while sampling to not even showing up after 45 minutes of
sampling due to the CPU usage being too low to be noticed.
By: Travis Watkins <amaranth@ubuntu.com>
